First off, thanks Tinitus, Dissi, and DumpTruck for clarifying some things in my last thread and sorry for creating a new thread, but I figured the title of the last thread no longer applied.
I'm still having a tough time pulling the trigger and committing on a setup with the following design constraints:
Questions:
I am guessing I have the following advantages and disadvantages to the two designs. Please feel free to correct as you see fit...
TM Advantages:
TM Disadvantages:
TMM(2.5) Advantages:
TMM(2.5) Disadvantages
I'm still having a tough time pulling the trigger and committing on a setup with the following design constraints:
- 14L box mounted to the wall (yeah I know, reflections and all that but its the only place I have)
- Crossover W/ miniDSP
- No subwoofer, so I want bass extension to 40Hz
- Room is short and speaker is mounted high so I'd like a wide vertical dispersion towards the floor
Questions:
- Will a TM or TMM(2.5) give me better dispersion towards the floor?
- Do I want to mount the tweeter on the top or bottom for a cabinet mounted high?
- If I do a TMM (2.5) with a 4-channel (total) miniDSP crossover, I assume I will need to do the .5 crossover passively. I assume I just wire an inductor in series with the .5 woofer? Is this good enough or do I need a steeper slope? Wise mix of passive and active circuitry?
- When actively crossing over a tweeter, is it a good idea to wire in a capacitor in series in case the DSP dumps its software and sends a full range signal to the tweet?
I am guessing I have the following advantages and disadvantages to the two designs. Please feel free to correct as you see fit...
TM Advantages:
- Deeper bass response (Lower f3)
- Wider vertical dispersion?
TM Disadvantages:
- Lower total SPL to work with active EQ
TMM(2.5) Advantages:
- Higher total SPL to work with active EQ, which could help overcome reflections due to wall mounting
- 'Bigger' sound with more midbass and ability to EQ lower bass
TMM(2.5) Disadvantages
- More unpredictable vertical dispersion?
- Mixing active and passive crossovers (Maybe this isn't so bad?)
- Higher f3